When I speak to clients during financial planning, a few questions come up again and again. I thought it may be useful to share how we can look at these questions because many investors may be wondering the same thing.<\/p>\n\n
“I am investing ₹50,000 every month. Is that enough?”<\/p>\n\n
Another common question I hear is: “I increase my SIPs by 10% every year. Is that good enough?”<\/p>\n\n
These sound like simple questions. But ₹50,000, ₹1 lakh or a 10% annual increase tell us very little by themselves.<\/p>\n\n
The more useful question is: Enough for what?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n Suppose I tell you: “I drive 50 kilometres every day. Is that enough?”<\/p>\n\n You cannot answer unless you know where I am trying to go and when I need to reach there.<\/p>\n\n If the destination is nearby, it may be more than enough. If it is 1,000 kilometres away and I need to reach tomorrow, clearly it is not.<\/p>\n\n Investing works much the same way.<\/p>\n\n ₹50,000 a month may be enough for one person and nowhere near enough for another. It depends on the goals you are trying to fund, how much those goals may require, when the money will be needed and how much you have already accumulated.<\/p>\n\n That is why these two statements are not the same: “I am investing regularly”<\/strong> and “I am on track for my goals.”<\/strong><\/p>\n\n You can invest diligently for years and still discover later that the amount was not enough.<\/p>\n\n Naturally, investors look for a rule.<\/p>\n\n “How much of my salary should I invest?”<\/p>\n\n “Is 20% enough?”<\/p>\n\n “Should I increase my SIP by 10% every year?”<\/p>\n\n Such numbers can be useful as broad assumptions or starting points. But they should not become financial rules that we follow mechanically.<\/p>\n\n There is no universal minimum or maximum investment amount.<\/p>\n\n Two people earning the same income may need to invest very different amounts. One may already have substantial investments and many years available. Another may have started later or have larger financial commitments.<\/p>\n\n So the right amount cannot come from a standard percentage. It has to come from your goals, your present financial position and the time available to you.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n The same applies to increasing investments every year.<\/p>\n\n A 10% annual SIP increase is commonly used in financial projections. But that does not mean everyone should increase investments by exactly 10%.<\/p>\n\n If your income rises substantially and you can comfortably increase your investments by 20%, 25% or 30%, why stop at 10% simply because a calculator assumes it?<\/p>\n\n And there may be another year when even a 10% increase is not practical.<\/p>\n\n A 10% SIP step-up is an assumption. It is not a financial rule.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n Once normal expenses, near-term requirements and necessary liquidity are taken care of, invest the genuine surplus available to you. If your ability to invest increases, increase your investments.<\/p>\n\n Suppose your financial plan indicates that a certain monthly investment should reasonably put your important goals on track.<\/p>\n\n Does that mean you should stop investing anything beyond that amount? Not necessarily.<\/p>\n\n Meeting financial goals is important, but it need not be the end of the journey.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n If you have additional genuine surplus, that money can continue working for you. Over time, it can build wealth, create a larger financial cushion and give you more choices later in life.<\/p>\n\n So the amount required for your goals may tell you what is needed for the plan.<\/p>\n\n It should not automatically become the maximum you are willing to invest.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n This is why rigid rules such as “I already invest 20% of my income, so I am saving enough” can be misleading.<\/p>\n\n Now consider the opposite situation.<\/p>\n\n You are already investing the genuine surplus available to you, but the amount may still not be enough for your goals. It means there is a gap that needs to be recognised.<\/p>\n\n Over time, you may be able to close it by investing more as your income rises, giving the goal more time or adjusting some expectations.<\/p>\n\n What we should avoid is making the gap disappear only by assuming higher returns.<\/p>\n\n A calculator may show that the plan works if we increase the expected return sufficiently. But nothing in your financial life has actually changed. We have changed the assumption, not the situation.<\/p>\n\n If there is a gap, it is better to see it clearly and deal with it through real changes rather than optimistic assumptions.<\/p>\n\n This connects with a theme running through my earlier articles.<\/p>\n\n In “Should You Invest in an International Fund? Try This Test First”<\/a><\/em>, the question was whether an investment had a purpose in the portfolio.<\/p>\n\nThe amount alone tells us very little<\/h2>\n\n
There is no magic SIP amount<\/h2>\n\n
There is no compulsory 10% step-up either<\/h2>\n\n
Meeting your goals should not become a ceiling<\/h2>\n\n
But what if you are already investing as much as you can?<\/h2>\n\n
Start with the purpose, not the product<\/h2>\n\n